Last update: |
||
12-Jun-2001
|
Arch Hellen Med, 17(6), November-December 2000, 584-592
ORIGINAL PAPER
Immunolocalization of cytokeratin 8 on epoxy resin
semithin sections
of infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas
S.
HAVAKI,1 I. BALTAZIS-VOLOUDAKIS,2
U. DAFNI,3
N. GOUTAS,1 D.L. ARVANITIS,4
Ch. KITTAS,1 E. MARINOS1
1Laboratory
of Histology and Embryology, Medical School, University of Athens,
2Department of Electron Microscopy and Cell
Biology, Research Center of Oncology “G. Papanikolaou”, “Saint Savas” Anticancer
Hospital,
3Department of Public Health, Faculty of Nursing,
University of Athens,
4Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology,
Medical School of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Greece
OBJECTIVE Cytokeratins belong
to the intermediate filament family of the epithelial cells. The cytokeratin
class expressed in an epithelial cell is cell specific. Cytokeratin 8 (CK8)
is present in simple epithelia, such as mammary gland duct cells, and in related
neoplasms. CK8 may be implicated in the promotion of breast cancer cell invasiveness
in vitro. It is immunolocalized at the outer phase of the cellular membrane
of breast cancer cells and is also released into the culture medium; the precise
distribution and function of CK8 in vivo has not yet been elucidated.
The purpose of this study was the immunolocalization of CK8, under the light
microscope, on epoxy resin semithin sections of infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas.
The role of CK8 as a prognostic factor was also investigated in infiltrating
ductal breast carcinomas.
METHOD Nine cases of infiltrating ductal breast
carcinoma and 4 cases of fibroadenoma were studied. In each case, small pieces
of fresh tissue were fixed, dehydrated, and embedded in a mixture of epoxy resins.
After removal of the epoxy resin polymer in semithin sections of selected cancerous
areas, the two step indirect immunoperoxidase method was applied for CK8 immunolocalization.
The average optical density in the cytoplasm of the cancer cells, which represents
the CK8 expression, was measured by image analysis and the results were analysed
statistically.
RESULTS In all cases of infiltrating ductal breast
carcinoma, grading of CK8 immunoreaction in the cytoplasm of cancer cells was
observed, but in the benign neoplasms the reaction was more intense and uniform.
No reaction was observed in negative controls. Statistically significant difference
was observed in the average cytoplasmic optical density of the cancer cells,
between histological grades II, III and the fibroadenomas, while there was no
statistically significant difference between histological grades I, II and III.
CONCLUSIONS The tissue preparation procedure
assured successful and specific CK8 immunolocalization on semithin sections
of infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas. It is possible that using the same
experimental material, the detailed distribution of CK8 can be further studied
under the electron microscope. The statistical analysis showed that the value
of CK8 expression in assessing tumor grade appears to be limited, where as it
can be used as a safe indicator to distinguish malignant from benign tumors.
Key words: Breast, Cytokeratin 8, Ductal infiltrating carcinoma, Immunohistochemistry, Morphometry.